|
Personal Religious Experience Paul tournier By
Daniel D. Musick, B.A., Wheaton College, 1973
http://www.garagedoor.org/paul_tournier/
These two experiences in Tournier's Christian life deserve closer attention,
particularly in relation to the effect they had on his life and his soteriology.
The first religious experience for Tournier occurred when he was 11 or 12, at
which time he surrendered or consecrated his life to Christ.18 In a
later reference to that event, Tournier notes that though he was a Christian, he
had not experienced conviction of his sins.19 Similarly, he had
neither surrendered his will20 nor experienced conversion.21
During the time between his first and second experiences, he was active in the
church,22 had written articles about Calvinism,23 and had
"fought for orthodoxy against liberalism."24 His Christian experience
did not become meaningful to him, however, until he later en-countered God. Of
that experience he states:
"I am not speaking of salvation, which is already accomplished in Jesus Christ.
It is rather a question of the transformation of my life, of my relationships
with everyone--with myself, my wife, my children, and my patients--which had
changed. Well, all the ensuing development of my existence came out of this face
to face encounter with God. My intimacy with him was accentuated bit by bit; my
life became enriched, freed from many hindrances; it gave me a vital interest in
that other side of life, for its inner dimension, so necessary to us."25
These experiences seem to have effected Tournier's universalism in two ways.
First, several aspects of his soteriology became disjunct in his interpretation
of these experiences. Dedication of one's life and be-coming a Christian, on the
one hand, became divorced from the experience of conversion on the other
hand--the conviction of sin, surrender of one's will, the regeneration of one's
life through personal encounter with God. Emphasis on personal salvation,
assuming Tournier had earlier stressed its significance, seems to have become
more of a historical fact. As a result of this second experience, and the
resulting disjuncture in his soteriology, there appear to be two consequences
which had direct bearing on his universalism. First, his emphasis on one's
personal encounter with God seems to have influenced his estimation of what the
most important religious experience is: it is not personal salvation or becoming
a Christian, but encountering God, which Tournier comes to conclude can be done
in other religions and even in non-religious atmospheres.26 Second,
his de-emphasis on faith in Christ and its relation to personal salvation, and
his apparent acceptance of salvation as a purely historical event probably made
it easier for him to accept a universalist perspective: if all was accom-plished
at the Cross, then it would be easy to assume the work of Christ was effective
for the salvation of all, irrespective of our response to the gospel.27
27This disjuncture is particularly noticeable in his first book,
written after his encounter with God in the Oxford Group. In the Healing of
Persons he cites more religious experiences than in any of his other works. He
cites examples of persons who encounter Christ (pp. 59, 153; cf. 43, 213, 222,
249), offer or dedicate their lives to Christ or God (pp. 15, 24, 92; 145, 150,
155; 174-5, 231, 281), experience God's forgiveness (pp. 25, 150); experience a
transformation of lives and attitudes (pp. 6, 119, 154; 220, 239; cf. 209-213,
222) and undergo conversion (pp. 108-109, 114, 130; 137, 174, 263, 277). Nowhere
does he refer to anyone being saved, however, nor does he even use the term in
the theological sense. Elsewhere in his writings one would be hard-pressed to
find Tournier referring to anyone being saved, or to the personal experience of
salvation.
Focal to Tournier's career were the death of both parents by the age of six,
his salvation/vocational decision at age twelve, and his sense of insecurity
during adolescence. He was greatly influenced by the Oxford Group Movement and
became active in its affairs during years when he was experiencing some
isolation from his own church. His early years as a physician found him seeking
to attend to the personal as well as the physical needs of his patients; his
style of practice became for him an expression of Christian witness and
ministry. Most of his writings are reflections on these experiences with persons
coupled with attempts to explicate a view of man consonant with the Christian
faith and modern psychology. H. Newton Malony
Fuller Theological Seminary
Graduate School of Psychology
Pasadena, California
....Paul Tournier...has frequently
expressed his debt to Buchman for much of his own approach to
counseling...."(29)
Lean further quotes Paul Tournier, the Swiss
psychiatrist, regarding Buchman's effect on the church. "Before Buchman the
church felt its job was to teach and preach, but not to find out what was
happening in people's souls. The clergy never listened in church, they always
talked" (153).
Emil Brunner
This theologian was probably the most influential on Tournier's universalism,
particularly in light of his association with him from his earlier years in the
Oxford Group.42 Several concepts can be found in Brunner's works
which also appear similarly in Tournier's writings. First, Brunner's emphasis on
God's unconditional love43 and forgiveness44 is also
prominent in Tournier's soteriology.45 Second, that Christ died for
all men, as Tournier believes,46 is also present in Brunner's
writings,47 though he never states that Christ's death is also
effective for the salvation of all men. Third, when Tournier points out that man
is both guilty and also forgiven,48 he could be echoing Brunner, who
similarly notes: "To love means to accept . . . [a sinner] as he is, 'in
Christ,' as one who has been judged in him and granted the grace of God, above
whom there stands the word 'sinner,' 'fallen being,' but also the word
'justified,' or 'one who has been restored."'49 Fourth, Brunner's
views on the reconciliation of all, and God's desire to save all50
are also reflected in Tournier's works.51 A final possible Brunnerian
influence on Tournier could have been his ideas on the possibility of universal
salvation. Brunner feels that no answer should be given to the question: "Is
there such a thing as final loss or is there a universal salvation"?
The basis of this view lies in his belief that "God does not belong to the realm
of perceptible objects, but to that of speaking and being spoken to."52
Hence, Brunner refuses to answer the question. Tournier, however, possibly
unaware of the basis of this paradox, the reasons for Brunner's refusal to
answer it, and the implications of answering it, possibly chose to naively
answer it: "Yes, there is such a thing as universal salvation."53
|