A PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH IN CERTAIN CASES
OF ALCOHOLISM
Francis
T. Chambers, Jr.
Mental
Hygiene, 21:67—78, 1937
I realize that it would be impossible in the
short space available to describe the various subdivisions of the
psychotherapeutic treatment advocated by the late Richard Peabody, which I am
using in treating abnormal drinkers; at best, I could leave only a vague
impression of the treatment as a whole. Therefore, I will limit this paper to
the approach that may lead up to a successful termination of a very common and
destructive addiction.
My work with abnormal drinkers has been made
possible by the generous help and cooperation of the psychiatric group and the
general practitioners in Philadelphia and its vicinity, as my layman status
makes it impossible for me to treat the condition in any but a non-medical
field. This has a psychological advantage in that those who consult me, with
the approval of a physician, come with a beginning already made.
First, they have admitted that they are
abnormal drinkers, an essential admission before treatment can be given.
Second, the suggestion has been given by a
physician whom they respect that there is a way to overcome alcoholism for a
group of addicts, who are not psychopathic, but who have sprung from a vast
legion of psychoneurotics, those so-called nervous individuals who have found
that a perverted indulgence of the intoxication impulse may serve as a
temporary compensation for a maladjustment of personality. This type of
neurotic alcoholic is unwilling to be considered either insane or stupid; for
this reason the best approach to a specialized treatment can be made by the
physician, who is usually present at the psychological moment when the patient
cries for help.
Once a patient has sought aid, the clinical
picture of alcoholism permits little opportunity for a misdiagnosis. You
distinguish the neurotic from the normal, though perhaps heavy drinker by his
inability to control his drinking and the stupidity of his sacrifice of the
most valuable things in life for the state of mind produced by his alcoholic
indulgence. Usually we find an uncontrolled drinker utilizing self-deception,
one phase of which is his forever blaming his addiction on the conditions of
his environment. In so doing he is only following in an exaggerated way the
same procedure practiced by his controlled-drinking brothers, whose nervous
systems are resistant to alcohol.
The controlled drinker usually wishes to
have an excuse for indulging himself. He drinks because it is hot, or because
it is cold; he drinks to prolong a pleasant occasion, and hi cheers himself up
with a drink when he is unhappy. In fact, to him alcohol is a sort of psychic
Aladdin’s lamp, which he uses to alter mentality. There is a vast difference
between this type and the uncontrolled drinker. The line separating abnormal
drinking from social drinking is a matter of the degree to which the drinker is
psychologically dependent on the drink. This in itself is a fairly accurate
indication whether the personality has or has not made a good adjustment to
reality. We find well-adjusted people using alcohol in its accepted legitimate
field, and though they may be far more addicted to it than they wish to admit,
they are able to limit their indulgence in it to given occasions, because,
having made good adjustments to reality, reality is acceptable to them. They
may for a little while put on the mask and costume of a psychic harlequin, but
after an hour or two they are quite ready to get back into their own more sober
psychic garments, even though they know that this change may be accompanied by
headache and frazzled nerves. On the other hand, the alcoholic, with his
psychoneurotic maladjustment, is searching for the psycho-medicinal properties
of alcohol rather than the pleasurable intoxicating effects.
Physicians who are familiar with the
anesthetics, ether and chloroform (the medicinally used narcotic intoxicants),
have ample opportunity to observe, in the operating room, the exciting phase
followed by complete anesthesia. At cocktail hour in any hotel or club bar, you
will see the social use of narcotic intoxicants by an earnest group who are
searching for and finding the exciting phase and the relaxing phase in a
narcotic intoxicant disguised as a highball or a cocktail, and having found
this pleasurable phase, they are satisfied. The abnormal drinker in the same
situation is getting drunk quickly because he is searching for the anaesthetic
properties or deeper narcotizing effects of alcohol. Hence we observe him
hurrying through the exciting pleasurable and relaxing phase brought about by
drinking in much the manner of one anaesthetizing himself. When you question
the abnormal drinker about this peculiarity, he assures you that he did not
mean to get drunk, nor did he want to get drunk; and I believe that consciously
he means what he says, not recognizing the tact that unconsciously there is a
demand for the oblivion of drunkenness, once the higher nerve centers have been
affected by alcohol.
The other day one of my friends who was
consulting me about his abnormal drinking said, "If you would only say
that you could teach the abnormal drinker how to drink in moderation, you would
have thousands flocking to your door." This is undoubtedly true, but if I
made any such claims, I should be the most unmitigated liar, and those who
consulted me would be doing so with no chance of success, for the simple reason
that normal intoxication is not what the alcoholic is after, nor is he ever
satisfied with it. The proof of this statement is obvious. No one makes these
people seek drunkenness, and yet that is the state in which they inevitably
arrive, if they use alcohol in any form whatsoever.
It is difficult to give a textbook
definition of the underlying neurotic condition that makes alcoholism possible
in certain individuals. It is perhaps most nearly covered by the definition of
"compulsion neurosis" as given by Professor Horace B.English:
"Group of mental disorders
characterized by an irresistible impulse to perform some apparently
unreasonable act or to cherish an unreasonable idea or emotion. Generally the
patient is not deluded and frankly admits the unreasonableness of his
attitude."
This definition would, of course, apply to
the alcoholic only when he has been sobered up, as the effects of alcohol may
create a delusional state.
The causes of an alcoholic compulsion
neurosis are soon apparent in a cooperative patient anxious to aid therapy by
unburdening himself of his innermost thoughts and reaction. Usually we find a
marked lack of mental hygiene in the early parental environment. Often one or
both parents have failed to make adequate adjustments to reality and they pass
on to their offspring, by suggestion and tactless handling, a predisposition to
maladjustment in maturity.
Citing from cases which I believe I have
analyzed correctly, I find overprotection in childhood is often projected into
adolescence and maturity as an abnormal dependence on the state of mind
produced by alcohol. For instance a mother consulted me about her grown son.
She was active in the prohibition movement and a strict disciplinarian in the
home, over which she domineered in a tyrannical manner, utilizing her fanatical
interpretation of right and wrong to justify her every intolerant attitude. At
thirty-one, her son was ruled by, and depended on, his forceful mother. He was
still waiting for her to manipulate the puppet strings. At the same time he
resented this forced dependence, and so he rebelled and hurt her in her tender
spot-prohibition - by seeking escape in chronic alcoholism, ironically enough
still depending on her in a way that she decidedly did not like.
Not infrequently the overprotection
resulting from inherited wealth seems to turn out ill-equipped personalities
that find an escape solution in alcohol. Man rich men, free from the necessity
of earning their bread in a business or a profession, seek to suppress their
creative urge by substituting alcoholic phantasies. Such men find in alcohol a
synthetic existence which apes the give and take of normal life (emphasis
always being on the take). This type might be described as perpetual euphoria
seekers. They usually must endure a severe alcoholic breakdown before they
learn the primary equation of life - that "you can’t get something for
nothing."
Among the neurotics who become alcoholic we
occasionally find an initial adjustment to a smooth, uneventful environment,
with no abnormal dependence on alcohol until an emotional shock is experienced.
Then they start searching for a stabilizer and often find it and utilize it
with little realization that they have developed a psychopathological
addiction; War experiences and business failures have produced a group of these
men who might under other circumstances have gone through life as normal
drinkers. Occasionally a gonorrhea infection and the mental reaction to it have
seemed to herald an abnormal addiction to alcohol. One man traced his narcotic
use of alcohol to the fact that, after a severe infection, the doctor who was
treating him said that if he started to drink and there was no return of his
symptoms, it would be a proof that the condition was cured. He went on a drinking
spree and though he had been a controlled drinker up to the time of this
incident, he found, after his humiliating experience, that alcohol offered him
a solace for the shame and feelings of inferiority which the disease had
caused. From this time on, he said, he used alcohol more and more as a psychic
cure-all.
Marital discord is often used as a reason
for drinking, but this is usually a cart-before-the-horse explanation whose
falsity is evident as soon as the patient gains real insight into his personality
maladjustment. The truth is that marriage enlarges the field of reality and
increases responsibility, the very thing the alcoholic was seeking to. avoid by
his narcotic use of alcohol. Hence the conspicuous failures of those women who
marry in order to reform their inebriate lovers.
An arrested psychological sexual development
is sometimes found at the bottom of discord between wife and alcoholic husband.
The husband blames his drinking, of his wife’s lack of affection. The wife, on
the other hand, is sexually and growing more so because of the impotency of her
husband, which is exaggerated by alcohol. Such a circle becomes ever more
vicious, the husband’s sense of inferiority being increased by his wife’s
attitude, which further inhibits the possibility of a normal sexual adjustment.
To add to the confusion, the husband considers alcohol as an aphrodisiac, not
realizing that the drug that narcotizes his inhibitions is equally narcotizing
his sexual power, so that metaphorically he is using gasoline to put out a
fire. I have recently had the pleasure of seeing a case of this sort gradually
work out into a normal adjustment. The insight gained and the readjustment of
the personality after reeducation, which was undertaken to overcome the
alcoholism, automatically took care of the sexual immaturity. This adjustment
could never have been made on any but a non-alcoholic basis.
The double standard of drinking which came
about during prohibition has increased the number of feminine inebriates. I
have found this condition harder to treat in the limited number of women who
consult me. They seem to find it more difficult to be absolutely frank about
themselves. However, where they can see the necessity of strict truthfulness
and are sincere in their desire to overcome abnormal drinking, they respond to
therapy in much the same manner as men. The underlying cause in women and in
men is the same - i.e., emotional immaturity, which renders their personalities
unequal to the task of facing reality. In their narcotic use of alcohol they
find the answer at least temporarily, and to the emotionally immature the
temporary solution is sufficient’. This temporary escape from reality is soon
extended into days and weeks.
Most of those who wish to take formal steps
to overcome their alcoholism are between the ages of thirty and fifty. This is
perhaps a psychological time, because under thirty the driving force of youth
and a nervous system that can withstand repeated alcohol shocks are reasons for
not taking the alcohol problem seriously. After thirty the abnormal drinker
gradually becomes aware that his drinking is forcing him to pay an exaggerated
price mentally, morally, and physically, and his inability to limit his
drinking to even the dissipated variety of indulgence is brought home to him by
repeated unsuccessful attempts. By this time the penalty that one must pay for
breaking any law of nature has become an obvious fact, no longer to be
dismissed with a shrug and a smile as it was in young manhood. In the last
analysis, I should say that the instinct of self-preservation is aroused only
when the situation is so bad that’ it cannot fail to cause the gravest
apprehension and alarm.
Having experienced fifteen years, as a
chronic alcoholic, I doubt whether any of us in the alcoholic brotherhood want
to get, well without reservations. Alcohol means too much to the man who is
using it psycho-medicinally for him to want to give it up in’ its entirety. The
best that can be hoped for is that he shall want to get well. Such a state of
mind is sufficient at least to get him to consult some one who can show him how
to help himself. Whether or not he will undergo treatment is another matter,
but usually if he gets as far as this, he is on his way to a more mature
handling of his problem. Bringing himself to this point amounts to a formal
admission on his part that something definite must be done.
In the first interview with the patient I
explain that I have been alcoholic and that I understand and sympathize with
what he is going through; after which I ask him to describe his own case in his
own way. I take down the history of his case as he gives it. I ask him to state
when he realized that his drinking was abnormal. I ask him his reasons for
consulting me and get him to describe his early environment and his present
environment. This may take several interviews during which I do not commit
myself as to whether or not I think he is a fit subject for this type of work.
I give him a copy of Richard Peabody’s book, The Common Sense of Drinking, and
ask him to mark any passages in it that he thinks are applicable to his case.
Though I find that many of these men have read Peabody’s book, they have little
more than a superficial understanding of their own problems, probably because,
at the time they read it, they were unwilling to project themselves into the
position of one in need of treatment. This marking of the book and the
subsequent discussions of it put psychotherapeutic treatment on a sound basis
from the start. The patient has shouldered the full responsibility of the
admission that he is one of those with a nervous system non-resistant to
alcohol. It is a form of self-analysis, and the patient usually appreciates,
and is impressed by, the fact that he is believed in and to a certain extent is
allowed to act as his own analyst.
It has been my experience in this type of
treatment that it is best never to attempt to convince a man that he is an
abnormal drinker; rather I put it to him that he must convince me, and
incidentally himself; that he is in need, of instruction in methods of helping
himself. I take my cue from Peabody with this approach, and I remember my own
shocked amazement in one of our early talks when he said somewhat as follows:
"If you have any, idea that you can still drink in moderation, there is
absolutely no use in your consulting me. If you really believe that you can
drink in a controlled manner despite what you have been through, the best thing
for you to do is to go out and try. Then if you fail, come back to me and I
will be glad to go into the matter further." This approach is a shock to
most men who have spent many years as abnormal drinkers. Heretofore they have
been surfeited with advice as to what they can and what they cannot do. They
have been told that they must never have liquor in the house, they must avoid
associating with their friends who drink, their wives must under no
consideration take anything to drink. Very often they have been advised to
leave their environment and attempt to make a new start in a community in which
there is no drinking. In the first place, I don’t know of any such community,
and in the second place, such advice amounts to telling a man that he is a
weakling and advising him to escape reality, which is the very thing he has
been attempting to do by his abnormal use of alcohol. The psychological
approach which I have found effective is that of accepting the prospective
patient as an individual who is perfectly able to stand on his own two feet,
provided he will apply himself to the work that is outlined for him in a
conscientious manner. It is up to him to prove whether or not he is in need of
hospitalization. Many men come to me in bad shape nervously, despite which they
say that they can pull themselves up in their own homes. My reply to this is,
"Fine, I hope you can. But, if you find you cannot, it is then up to you
to admit it, and we will make arrangements for you to go somewhere and get
physically and nervously in shape." The purpose of this is twofold - to
get the patient to act entirely on his own, and to allow him to determine his
own degree of stability or instability. The man who can not pull himself out of
an alcoholic rut in his own environment, and who admits it, is in a position to
benefit by institutional treatment without the resentment that usually results
when outsiders frighten or overpersuade one to go to an institution.
As I wish to keep my contact with the
patient on a basis of friendship and mutual trust, I try to be entirely frank
and honest in my approach. For instance, I tell him that I am going to instruct
his wife, with his full consent, to let me know if he has a relapse. I explain
to him that this is not done because I feel that he will not be perfectly
honest with me, but because a man who has started to drink and is in the
throes of an alcoholic breakdown is not capable of acting in a mature or
reasoning manner. I always try to keep the patient informed of the reasons for
everything that has to do with treatment. In fact, I consider him more of a
student than a patient - a student who his failed to pass the final entrance
examination into a mature existence. It is up to him to gain insight as to why
he failed and how he can succeed. There is only one thing that will prevent his
passing this examination, and that is retaining the state of mind that sought
an escape from reality in the use of alcohol. This is the reason why this
psychotherapy has been an effective treatment in a great many cases of chronic
alcoholism. It is well called reeducation, which is a word implying the
possibility of a new and successful adaptation to life. For this reason, the
insane and the imbecile must be excluded from the group who may be said to have
a favorable prognosis.
If we accept alcoholism as a compulsion
neurosis, psychotherapeutic measures at once suggest themselves, and we see
that insight, reeducation, and readaption of the personality must be brought
about before the condition can be cleared up. This, I think, is the correct
approach and one more hopeful and helpful than the defeatist stand so often
taken, or the limited objective of keeping a man sober by any means that occur
to an adroit mind.
The following quotation from Dr. Abraham
Myerson, in his book, The Psychology of Mental Disorders is of interest. He
says:
"The alcoholic’s mental disease
disappears with abstinence and there is nothing to distinguish him from other
people except his reaction to alcohol." I beg to disagree. There are many
things, besides his reaction to alcohol, by which he may be distinguished from
other people. That reaction is definitely and recognizably abnormal, but so is
the state of mind back of that reaction. Peabody referred to the alcoholic’s
conflict in sobriety and pointed out that until this conflict - whether or not
to drink again - is settled on a lasting basis, nothing of a permanent curative
nature has taken place. Settling this conflict once and for all time is not the
simple proposition that many non-addicted seem to think. The man who has not
experienced the state of mind of alcoholism usually has little realization of
the bombardment of alcoholic impulses that besiege such a mind in periods of
sobriety. Nearly, every association of life has an alcoholic tie- up. Without
alcohol the mental process is a painful one which the addict knows can be
temporarily relieved by a reversion to his habit. The state of, mind denied
alcohol could be compared to a dull perpetual ache rather than an agony. I
asked one man who had been off alcohol for three weeks before he consulted me
how often the thought of drinking came up in his mind. "It is much less
now," he said, "I only average an alcoholic thought about every
fifteen minutes."
The gesture of making a formal effort to
give up alcohol creates an added mental conflict. Baudouin, in describing the
difficulties of a patient overcoming a neurosis, used a very apt simile which I
think is particularly applicable to the man undertaking treatment for
alcoholism. He compared the neurotic to one who is learning to ride a bicycle.
Ahead of him looms a large dangerous rock and, despite himself, he seems drawn
towards it and usually comes a cropper on it. Probably we have all experience
this in learning to ride a bicycle, and we know that confidence and technique
soon enable us to avoid the rock. To the alcoholic the rock signifies drinking:
He wishes to avoid it, yet seems irresistibly drawn toward it. Psychologically
the job is to teach him how to ride the bicycle and to show him how to avoid
the rock, so that with a new technique he may learn to travel the pleasant road
of reality that lies on the farther side.
To sum up the psychological approach to
certain cases of alcoholism, the following methods of treating these cases have
been of the greatest help to me:
1. Letting the patient convince me, and
incidentally himself, that he is an abnormal drinker.
2. Allowing him to pick out his own
characteristics in Peabody’s book, The Common Sense of Drinking.
3. Always taking the scientific psychological
approach to the problem, which is usually welcomed as a relief from admonitions
and emotional approaches.
4. Helping him to gain a psychological
insight into his alcoholic problem and discussing his other problems with him
during frequent appointments.
5. Instructing him how to relax physically,
and mentally and following this with suggestion while he is in a relaxed state.
6. Discussing alcoholic dreams. It is
significant that every cooperative patient who has worked with me has, after a
period of abstinence, experienced dreams of an alcoholic wishfulfillment
nature.
7. Giving the patient for exhaustive study
some 80 notes by Richard Peabody which he kindly allowed to use in my work.
These notes are of particular interest in that they cover and redirect certain
trends of mind that inevitably occur to the man undergoing treatment. The vivid
imagination of some of my patients has enabled me to add to these notes from
time to time.
8. Mapping out a course of outside study so
that it is interesting to the individual case.
9. Systematizing a daily routine, which
includes the keeping of a schedule, exercise, recreation, study, business, and
hobbies.
The length of time necessary for adequate
treatment is usually from 80 to 100 hours over a period of a year. With the
beginning of treatment, two or three "hourly appointments a week are
necessary. Where patients are in hospital, daily appointments for several
weeks, in conjunction with medical care, physio and occupational therapy, and a
scheduled existence, constitute an ideal beginning for treatment.
The major advantage of this form of therapy,
however, is that it is carried on after the patient has returned to his
environment. Here he has a chance to apply his newly learned’ psychological
reapproach on the actual battle front, where the real test must take place. It
is the adjustment in his environment with a sympathetic instructor that is the
most important phase of readjusting the point of view of the chronic alcoholic.
The battle front is life, his life, with its sorrows and joys, perhaps
complicated by a nagging ,or flirtatious wife, or domineering parents, a
vicious business partner, or personal failures and successes, or just monotony
and boredom. These are the offensive and defensive engagements that the
partially rehabilitated personality must face. It seems reasonable that this
best be done with some one who understands the condition and who can discuss
the problems of adjustments as they occur, in conjunction with the opening of
the mind and reeducation along modern scientific methods.
The successful patient is one who realizes that alcohol is a mental poison for him, and who has learned, by repeated actual experiments over a long period of time, that the technique of, facing reality is a far more pleasant and dividend-paying proposition than finding a miserable escape in alcohol.