Lay Therapy
From PRIMER ON ALCOHOLISM, by Marty
Mann, 1950. Chapter 12, pages 139-145.
The term "lay therapy" means,
literally, treatment by laymen. In the field of alcoholism, it is a term, which
usually means a particular method of treating alcoholics, a method which is
also known as the "Peabody method," after the man who developed it
and described it in his book The Common Sense of Drinking. Peabody himself was
taught by Courtenay Baylor, to whom his book is dedicated, but so far as is
known he was the first to devote himself entirely to the treatment of
alcoholics, and to achieve considerable success in this field in the late
1920’s and early 1930’s.
The treatment, like all treatments, which
have had any success, is predicated upon the assumption that, while alcoholism
cannot be "cured," it can be successfully arrested if the alcoholic
can be helped to eliminate drinking from his life completely. The Peabody
method of achieving this goal is a system of psychological re-education,
designed specifically to teach the alcoholic to accept the fact that he can
never drink again, and to further teach him ways and means by which he can
adapt himself to a life without drinking. Peabody summarized his technique as
follows:
The treatment consists in instructing a man
how to train his mind so that he carries out a sustained course of conduct
consistent with the theories of his most mature intellectual self, how to form
new habits and stick to them, and conversely how to eliminate the
unsatisfactory method of trying to adapt himself to his environment through the
medium of alcohol. The re-education is comprised of the following steps:—
1. A
mental analysis is made wherein the drinker learns that certain actions and
systems of thinking, past as well as present, have directed him on the
unfortunate course he has been pursuing, by creating doubts, fears, and
conflicts. When these are removed his energy is free to take up more
interesting and constructive occupations.
2. Various
factors contribute to an abnormal state of tension, which drink temporarily
releases, only to aggravate it in the long run. This tension can be
permanently removed by learning formal relaxation and suggestion.
3. The
unconscious mind can be influenced by suggestion so that it co—operates with
the conscious to bring about a consistent, intelligent course, of action.
4. Actions
(where they are not mere reflexes) are the direct result of thoughts.
Experience has proved over and over again that thoughts can be definitely
controlled and directed when it seems desirable to do so.
5. As
the body and the mind are indivisible parts of the same organism, the mind is
naturally much more efficient in the execution of new ideas if it is
functioning in a sound body. To this end the elements of a normal, healthy
hygiene should be followed. If there is any actual or suspected disability it
should be attended to by a competent physician.
6. The
alcoholic is to a large extent demoralized and disintegrated. To overcome this
condition a direct attack must be made on the small habits of daily efficiency.
Alcohol is too strong an enemy to fight with untrained forces. To this end
living by a self-made and self-imposed schedule will accomplish three very
important results: (a) The individual is continuously occupied; (b) he is
conscious that he is doing something concrete about his problem (in contrast to
mere intellectualizing); (c) he trains himself constantly in minor ways to obey
his own commands. This develops an ability to say "Yes" when he
means, "Yes," and "No" when he means "No."
7. Various
unexpected pitfalls into which people have previously slipped are carefully
explained so that the drinker is forewarned and forearmed as much as possible
against the future.
8. Some
means of self—expression, some outlet or hobby to satisfy the urge to create,
some means of absorbing the will—power must be energetically sought. The mind
cannot dwell on the subject of not drinking all the time, important as it may
be. It must be diverted, intrigued, and if possible, inspired. This does not
always happen until the cure is completed, but if it can take place earlier it
is a good assistance to rapid recovery.
9. The
individual is only an inferior person as long as he continues to drink. The
same driving force that has brought disintegration, if given a chance under
conditions of sobriety, will carry him beyond the level of achievement attained
by his average contemporary. He has an energy within which must be utilized
constructively or it will destroy him.
What Dr. Milton Harrington says of people
with strong instinctive tendencies, seems to be equally applicable to
alcoholics. Instinctive tendencies, he says, "drive some upward to
success, while in others, who are unable to direct them into satisfactory
channels, they are dammed up, find outlet in unhealthy ways, and so, instead of
doing useful work, react on the mind to distort and destroy it."
It is obvious that this method requires time
and effort on the part of both therapist and patient. Peabody himself
calculated that it took from 60 to 100 hours, stretched over a year or more. It
is equally obvious that the patient must be not only willing, but ready to give
full co-operation to such a process. Peabody defined those to whom his method
was applicable as follows: .
"Scientific treatment for the
eradication of the drink habit can be successfully applied to sane men who have
come to realize that drink has definitely disintegrated them to a point where
they are no longer able to control themselves, but who would sincerely like to
eliminate the habit if they could be shown how to do so."
This is clear enough, but there is something
else, which Peabody nowhere states in his book. There is an X-factor in this
method, and it lies in the personal qualifications of the therapists who teach
the method. Peabody was an alcoholic who had recovered through a similar method
taught by Courtenay Baylor. Peabody’s followers who became therapists were men
who had recovered by this method. Therein, perhaps, lies one of the secrets of
the success, which the method attained. Peabody undoubtedly knew that no one
else was quite as likely to have the necessary attitude of sympathetic
understanding, the complete knowledge of the tortuous workings of the alcoholic
mind, and the essential patience, which are primary requisites for dealing with
these difficult cases. Naturally, the mere fact that a man was an alcoholic who
had recovered was not enough to make him a therapist of a technique as
complicated as this one; only a few of Peabody’s patients were trained by him
to teach the method. But these few accomplished a heroic work during the
1930’s, when little else was being done for alcoholics.
This work showed that the Peabody Method was
effective with a considerable number of alcoholics. It is still effective today
with some alcoholics, for it has a particular appeal to certain types, and they
and their families should know of its existence. Especially in the middle and
upper income brackets there are many alcoholics who still hold jobs, who still
have what they think of as "a position to keep up." These people
often find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, either to consult a
psychiatrist or to seek help from a group such as Alcoholics Anonymous. In the
first instance they fear that going to a psychiatrist means an admission of
mental weakness or abnormality; in the second, any group approach is repugnant
to them, for many reasons. The reasons for such hesitations may be invalid, but
are nevertheless very real barriers, which effectively prevent some alcoholics
from getting the help, which they desperately need.