|
The First Nationwide Alcoholics Anonymous History Conference
Phoenix, Arizona, February 21 - 23, 2003
Remarks of Dick B.
Paradise Research Publications, Inc., P.O. Box 837, Kihei, HI
96753-0837
Ph/fax: 808 874 4876; Email:
dickb@dickb.com
URL:
http://www.dickb.com/index.shtml
This material is Copyright 2003 by Anonymous.
Printed in USA. All rights reserved.
Permission to reprint in whole or in part is confined to
www.aabibliography.com site.
The First Nationwide A.A. History Conference
Dick B.’s Comments
[Part Two]
Alcoholics Anonymous, the Founders, and Belief in Almighty God
Without Apparent
Exception, A.A.’s Founders Believed the Creator Cured Them
There is no need here
to go to the documentation in my titles God and Alcoholism: Our Growing
Opportunity in the 21st Century and Cured: Proven Help for
Alcoholics and Addicts. Suffice it to say that Bill Wilson said the Lord had
cured him of his "terrible disease." Dr. Bob spoke of Wilson’s being cured and
then told his colleagues that he and another [Wilson] had discovered a cure for
alcoholism. A.A. Number Three, Bill Dotson, declared that Wilson’s statement
that the Lord had cured him had become for him [Dotson] the golden text of A.A.
Pioneer Clarence Snyder spoke many times of the cures early AAs had received.
The person who drafted one of the proposed covers for the First Edition of
Alcoholics Anonymous (published in 1939) put on the cover that it offered a
cure for alcoholism. Extensive remarks of this kind were made by Larry Jewell
(who was sponsored by Dr. Bob and Clarence Snyder). Jewell made them in a series
of articles he wrote for The Houston Press in 1940. And the words of
these old times were echoed by others contemporaneously. The Reverend Dr.
Dilworth Lupton, pastor of the First Unitarian Church in Cleveland, wrote of the
new cure in the Cleveland Plain Dealer in 1939. Morris Markey spoke of
the "miraculous" "cure" for habitual drunkards in his Liberty Magazine
article in 1939. Theodore English wrote in Scribner’s Commentator in
January of 1941 that Wilson had developed a cure that had enlisted half the
alcoholics encountered by the Houston AA group and cured two-thirds of them. Dr.
William Duncan Silkworth (who wrote the "Doctor’s Opinion" for Alcoholics
Anonymous) told one of his alcoholic patients (Charles K.) that the only
hope for his cure was through the "Great Physician," Jesus Christ. See Norman
Vincent Peale, The Positive Power of Jesus Christ (NY: Guideposts, 1980),
pp. 59-63. Finally, the AA Grapevine published an article by the famous
medical writer Paul de Kruif stating the "A.A.’s medicine is God and God alone.
This is their discovery. . . [and] that the patients it cures have to nearly die
before they can bring themselves to take it."
Yet by 1980–forty-five
years after A.A.’s founding–an AA "Conference Approved" publication stated quite
bluntly that, in effect, these sources were mistaken, misleading, and wrong [DR.
BOB, supra, p. 136].. Despite this about-face by official A.A.
employees, the only bases for such a claim that the founders had misrepresented
to, and mislead the facts to the world were two ideas Bill Wilson had inserted
in his Big Book four years after A.A.’s founding. And these ideas have
persisted through all four editions of A.A.’s basic text. These new ideas were:
(1) "We have seen the truth demonstrated again and again: ‘Once an alcoholic
always an alcoholic’." (Alcoholics Anonymous, 4th ed., p. 33).
(2) "We are not cured of alcoholism" (Alcoholics Anonymous, 4th
ed., p. 85). The first statement, according to Wilson’s own explicit admission,
came from a contemporary therapist named Richard R. Peabody, who died drunk, and
therefore "proved," said Wilson, that alcoholism was "uncurable." The second
statement flew in the face of all the evidence we cited above, which
demonstrates that alcoholics had been cured, that they had been cured by
God, and that the cures were miraculous, astonishing, and the basis for the
whole "spiritual program of recovery" that AAs developed between 1935 and 1938.
Details and documentation for each of these points can be found in Dick B.,
Cured: Proven Help for Alcoholics and Addicts (Kihei, HI: Paradise Research
Publications, Inc., 2003); Richard R. Peabody, The Common Sense of Drinking
(Atlantic Monthly Press Book, 1933); and Katherine McCarthy, The Emanuel
Movement and Richard Peabody (Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Vol. 45, No. 1,
1984).
A Large Dose of Pre-AA
miraculous healings by the power of God:
Many have minimized or
outright dismissed the miraculous. They have done so in various ways, depending
upon the era involved.
For example, Old
Testament signs and wonders are often relegated to the myth bin by calling them
interpretative, artistic, imaginative, embellished, "touched up,"filled with
discrepancies, or the products of tradition rather than experience. See Bernard
W. Anderson, Understanding The Old Testament (NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.,
1957), pp. 43-44, 180-82, 227, 385, 407-09. Other authorities, however, plainly
state that signs, wonders, and miracles of Old Testament accounts had as their
object the indication of the severity of an illness and the gravity of the
prognosis against which to contrast the greatness of the cure and the divine
power that effected it. These authorities–and they are numerous generally
attribute the healings and miracles to the intervention of God. See New Bible
Dictionary, Second Edition (England: Inter-Varsity Press, 1982), pp. 457-65.
The healing accounts
of the Gospels have also been denied for a variety of reasons. Philip Schaff
wrote: "The credibility of the Gospels would never have been denied if it were
not for the philosophical and dogmatic skepticism which desires to get rid of
the supernatural and miraculous at any price." See Philip Schaff, History of
the Christian Church, Volume I, 3rd Revision (Grand Rapids, MI:
Wm B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company, 1890), p. 589. Decades later, writers
popular in the early A.A. days, were still disputing the miraculous. See Emmet
Fox, The Sermon on the Mount (New York: Harper & Row, 1934) and Dilworth
Lupton, Religion Says You Can (Boston: The Beacon Press, 1938). Long
before these johnnie-come-latelies of the 1930's, however, scholars were citing
emphatically: "great writers who were by no means biased in favor of orthodoxy
[including] Dr. W.E. Channing, leader of American Unitarianism, who said: ‘I
know of no histories to be compared with the Gospels in marks of truth, in
pregnancy of meaning, in quickening power. . . As to his [Christ’s] biographers,
they speak for themselves. Never were more simple and honest ones." Schaff,
History of the Christian Church, supra, p. 589.
So, also, despite
volumes of testimony to the contrary, writers and various "historians" have
disputed the miracles and healings by the Apostles as recorded in the Book of
Acts. They have alleged that the "age of miracles" in the First Century passed
out of the picture, sometimes allegedly because they were merely a stage which
God no longer needed, or that they were myth and error. See Adolf Harnack,
The Expansion of Christianity in the First Three Centuries, Vol I (Eugene,
OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1998), pp. 121, 143, 180, 256-57, 268. The
disputers have also placed in their disputed box, categorized, minimized,
ridiculed, and often rejected endless numbers of Christian healers and healings
from Mary Baker Eddy to Lourdes to Benny Hinn and Oral Roberts. But, for the
founders of A.A., the proof was in the pudding; and Dr. Bob read extensively
about healing by the power of God. In fact, even a brief glance at the Christian
healing literature of the 1930's–in A.A.’s founding years–will disclose a myriad
of scholarly studies of God’s healing power and healings in the physical,
psychological, mental, devil spirit, and other realms. We have included many of
these in our bibliography.
What the Bible has
to say about:
Miraculous
healings long before Christ: Morton T. Kelsey comments: "As we have
already seen, in the
Old Testament there was no question, in theory, that Yahweh could heal. In
several places remarkable instances were recorded. See Morton T. Kelsey,
Psychology, Medicine & Christian Healing. Rev. and exp. ed. (San Francisco:
Harper & Row, Publishers, 1966), p. 33. Specific examples include children given
to women who were barren (Genesis 18:10, 14; Judges 13:5, 24; 1 Samuel 1:19-20;
2 Kings 4:16-17); the healing of Miriam’s leprosy (Numbers 12:1-15) and Naaman’s
leprosy (2 Kings 5:1-14); healing of Jeroboam’s paralyzed hand (1 Kings 13:1-6);
raising from the dead by Elijah (1 Kings 17:17-24) and by Elisha (2 Kings
4:1-37); salvation of the Israelites from the later plagues in Egypt (Numbers
21:6-9); and the miracles wrought by Moses (Exodus 7-17). See New Bible
Dictionary, supra, pp. 462, 782-83; Kelsey, Psychology, Medicine &
Christian Healing, supra, pp. 33-36; In Healing: Pagan And
Christian (London: Society For Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1935), George
Gordon Dawson opines: "The standpoint of the Old Testament, generally, is that
good health results from holy living. It is a divine gift and the reward of
loving service. Any cure of disease was regarded as a gift from Yahweh, and
resulted from forgiveness. The sick person made his peace with Him by
repentance, intercession and sacrifice. The right spiritual relationship was
restored. The soul was at rest, and the inner life being calm the bodily
symptoms disappeared" (p. 90). Alan Richardson writes: . . . in the Old
Testament the historically decisive event, which became for the Hebrew mind, the
symbol and type of all God’s comings in history is the Miracle of the Red Sea.
See Alan Richardson, The Miracle Stories of the Gospels (London: SCM
Press Ltd, 1941), pp. 3-4.
Miracles in the
Gospels: "they brought unto Him all that were sick and them that were
possessed with demons,
and He healed many that were sick with diverse diseases, and cast out many
demons. . . He had healed many in so much that as many as had plagues pressed
upon Him that they might touch Him." See Elwood Worcester, Samuel McComb, Isador
H. Coriat, Religion and Medicine (NY: Moffat, Yard & Company, 1908), p.
345; Elwood Worcester and Samuel McComb, The Christian Religion As A Healing
Power (NY: Moffat, Yard & Company, 1909), pp. 84-97; G. R. H. Shafto, The
Wonders of The Kingdom: A Study of the Miracles of Jesus (NY: George H.
Doran Company, 1924), pp. 8-9. Shafto calculated that there are some forty-two
of the foregoing indirect references to miraculous action on the part of Jesus
in the four Gospels. Kelsey concluded: ". . . we find that everywhere Jesus went
he functioned as a religious healer. Forty-one distinct instances of physical
and mental healing are recorded in the four gospels (there are seventy-two
accounts in all, including duplications), but this by no means represents the
total. Many of these references summarize the healings of large numbers of
people." See Kelsey, Psychology, Medicine & Christian Healing, supra,
pp. 42-47. Alan Richardson points out the high proportion of the Gospel
tradition that is devoted to the subject of miracle (209 verses out of 666 in
the Gospel of Mark). See Richardson, The Miracle Stories, supra,
p. 36. There are over 20 specific accounts - some healed at a distance, some
with a word, and some with physical contact and means: blindness, deafness;
dumbness, leprosy, epilepsy, dropsy, uterine hemorrhage, Peter’s mother-in-law
and her fever–possibly malaria, Malcus’ severed ear; the man with withered hand,
the woman bent double with a "spirit of infirmity," three separate people
resurrected from the dead; the man paralyzed for 38 years, demoniacal
possession, and so on. Percy Dearmer reports there are forty-one instances of
Christ’s works of healing in the Gospels (Body and Soul, below, p.
142-46). Also the miracles of water converted to wine, stilling of a storm,
supernatural catch of fish, multiplying food, walking on water, money from a
fish, a fig tree dried up. See New Bible Dictionary, supra, pp.
462-63; Leslie D. Weatherhead, Psychology, Religion and Healing (NY:
Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, 1951), pp. 29-69; Worcester, McComb, Coriat,
Religion and Medicine, supra, pp. 338-68; Josh McDowell, Evidence
That Demands a Verdict: historical evidences for the Christian faith (Campus
Crusade for Christ, Inc., 1973), pp. 128-31. Luke 7:21-22 state: "And in that
same hour he cured many of their infirmities and plagues, and of evil spirits;
and unto many that were blind he gave sight. Then Jesus answering said unto
them, Go your way, and tell John what things ye have seen and heard; how that
the blind see, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead
are raised, to the poor the gospel is preached." For a survey of the evidence,
see E. R. Micklem, Miracles & The New Psychology: A Study in the Healing
Miracles of the New Testament. London: Oxford University Press, 1922.
Miracles in the
Book of Acts in Apostolic times: "many wonders and signs were done
by the apostles. . .by
the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the
people. . . . Stephen, full of grace and power, wrought great wonders and signs.
. . [as to Philip in Samaria] many with unclean spirits and many that were
palsied and lame. . . [as to Paul and Barnabus] speaking of the signs and
wonders God had wrought among the gentiles by them. . . [as to healing
activities of Paul on the island of Malta] The rest also who had diseases in the
island came and were cured" See Weatherhead, Psychology, Religion and Healing,
supra, pp. 70-72; Kelsey, Psychology, Medicine And Christian Healing,
supra, pp. 83-102.. More specifically, the lame man at the Gate Beautiful,
patients cured by the shadow of Peter and handkerchiefs which had touched them;
restoration of the sight of Saul by Ananias; Peter’s healing Aenes of palsy; the
paralytic healed by Paul at Lystra; the healing of Publius’s father of fever and
dysentery by Paul; Dorcas and Eutychus were raised from the dead;
multiple healings; and two occasions where demons were cast out. See New
Bible Dictionary, supra, pp. 462-64. Harnack summed up with this
quotation from Hebrews 2:3-4: "How shall we escape, if we neglect so great
salvation: which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed
unto us by them that heard him; God also bearing them witness, both with signs
and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to
his own will?" See Harnack, The Expansion of Christianity in the First Three
Centuries, Vol. I, supra, pp. 250-73. There is a list of the specific
miracles in the Acts of the Apostles. See Pearcy Dearmer, Body and Soul: An
Enquiry into the Effects of Religion upon Health, with a Description of
Christian Works of Healing From the New Testament to the Present Day.
London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd., 1909, pp. 183-91.
What Early
Christians accomplished:
Miracles after
apostolic times and in early centuries: There is evidence of Christian
healing from these
sources: Quadratus of Athens (AD 126 or 127); St. Justin Martyr (the philosopher
martyred circa 163, AD 100-163); St. Irenaeus (Bishop of Lyons, A.D. 120-202);
Origen of Alexandria (AD 185-253), Tertullian (AD 193-211), St. Hilarion (monk,
AD 291-371); St. Parthenius (Bishop of Lampsacus, AD circa 335-355); St.
Macarius of Alexandria and four other Monks (AD 375-390); St. Martin (Bishop of
Tours, AD circa 395- 397); St. Ambrose of Milan (AD 340-397), St. Chrysostom (AD
347-407), St. Augustine (AD 354-430), St. Jerome (AD 340-420); St. Symeon
Stylites (layman, AD 391-460); St. Eugendus, Abbot of a monastery near Geneva,
AD 455-517); St. Caesarius (Bishop of Arles, 502-542); St. German (Bishop of
Paris, circa AD 555-576); St. Laumer priest near Chartres, AD 548-651); St.
Eustace (Abbot of Luxeuil, circa 614-625); St. Riemirus (abbot of a monastery in
the diocese of Le Mans, circa 660-699); Sophronius (Patriarch of Jerusalem, AD
640); St. Cuthbert (Bishop of Lindisfarne, AD 635-687), and St. John of Beverley
(by Bede AD 721). See Leslie D. Weatherhead, Psychology, Religion, and
Healing, supra, pp. 76-84; Worcester, McComb and Coriat, Religion
and Medicine, supra. p. 367; Worcester and McComb, The Christian
Religion as a Healing Power, supra, p.95. In a monumental treatise
based largely on the Book of James as it relates to healing and anointing, F. W.
Puller says: "I think I have shown that from the time of the Apostles onwards,
during the first seven centuries of our era, the custom of praying over sick
people and anointing them with holy oil continued without any break. And there
seems to me to be good reasons for believing that in many cases the petitions
that were offered were granted and that the holy oil was used by God as a
channel for conveying health to the sick persons." See F. W. Puller, The
Anointing of the Sick in Scripture and Tradition, with some Considerations on
the Numbering of the Sacraments (London: Society For Promoting Christian
Knowledge, 1904), p. 188; Pearcy Dearmer, Body and Soul, supra.
Kelsey points to the important study by Evelyn Frost. which covers the earliest
records of the church after the New Testament, from about the years 100 to 250
[Evelyn Frost, Christian Healing: A Consideration of the Place of Spiritual
Healing in the Church of To-day in the Light of the Doctrine and Practice of the
Ante-Nicene Church (1940)]; and Kelsey says of the Frost study: "It shows
clearly that the practices of healing described in the New Testament continued
without interruption for the next two centuries." Kelsey, Psychology,
Medicine And Christian Healing, supra, pp. 103-156.
Healing ministry
by individuals from 1091 forward to the late 1800's: There is
testimony of
individual healers, who, with no psychological technique, but through their
communion with Christ by His power, healed the sick: St. Bernard of Clairvaux
(1091-1153); St. Francis of Assisi (1182-1226); St. Thomas of Hereford
(1282-1303); St. Catherine of Siena (1347-1380), Martin Luther (1483-1546), St.
Francis Xavier (1506-1552), St. Philip Neri (1515-1595); George Fox (1624-1691);
John Wesley (1703-1791); Prince Alexander of Hohenlohe (1794-1849); Father
Theobald Matthew (of Ireland, 1790-1856), Dorothea Trudel (from Zurich,
1813-1862); Pastor John Christopher Blumhardt (Lutheran pastor from
Stuttgart,1805-1880); and Father John of Cronstadt (of the Orthodox Church of
the East, 1829-1908). See Weatherhead, supra, p. 86; Worcester and McComb,
Religion and Medicine, supra, p. 367; Dearmer, Body and Soul,
supra, p. 278, 338-82. Kelsey, Psychology, Medicine And Christian
Healing, supra, pp. 157-188.
The Hypothesis
that the First Century ended miracles even though there is no
Biblical authority for
this proposition–a contention contrary to the promises of the Creator: There
has come into the healing picture the widely believed, but undocumented, claim
that the "age of miracles" ended because God no longer had use for them. First
of all, the Creator’s abilities did not cease; nor did the power that He made
available through the accomplishments of Jesus Christ end. That power and the
gifts of healing may actually have been little used or undeclared because of
church wrangling, but the Bible assurances did not change. Despite an increasing
separation between medical healing and religious healing during the first years
of the nineteenth century, "Pentecostal Christianity" and the work of many
individuals brought Biblical assurances to the practical fore. The individuals
included Glenn Clark, Mary Baker Eddy, A. J. Gordon, Pearcy Dearmer, Agnes
Sanford, Starr Daily, John and Ethel Banks, Oral Roberts, Ruth Carter Stapleton,
and a number in the Roman Catholic Community. See Kelsey, Psychology,
Medicine and Christian Religion, supra, pp. 186-284.
Yahweh’s promises in
His Word have not changed: See Exodus 15:26: "I am the Lord that healeth thee;"
Psalm 103:3-4: Yahweh our God forgives all our iniquities, heals all our
diseases, and redeems our lives from destruction;" Matthew 10:8: "Heal the sick,
cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received,
freely give;" Mark 16:19-30: "And these signs shall follow them that believe: In
my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues. . . they
shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover;" John 14:12: "Verily,
verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do
also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father."
These and many other Bible assurances were the daily diet of many early AAs and
particularly Dr. Bob as he frequently used The Runner’s Bible devotional.
See the verses and comments in Nora Smith Holm, The Runner’s Bible: Spiritual
Guidance for People On The Run (Lakewood, CO: I-Level Acropolis Books,
Publisher, 1998), pp. 171-96. Also, J. R. Pridie, The Church’s Ministry of
Healing (London: Society For Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1926); C. S.
Lewis, Miracles: How God Intervenes in Nature and Human Affairs (NY:
Collier Books, 1947); Friedrich Heiler, Prayer: A Study in the History of
Psychology and Religion (Oxford: Oneworld, 1932); Jim Wilson, Healing
Through The Power of Christ (Cambridge, England: James Clarke & Co., Ltd.,
1946); Dawson, Healing: Pagan and Christian, 1935, supra; Philip
Inman, Christ in the Modern Hospital (London: Hodder & Stoughton Limited,
1937); G. R. H. Shafto, The Wonders of the Kingdom, 1924, supra.
The Successes of
the Christian Missions and Evangelism:
A. Rescue Missions:
Religious "conversion" was the catch-word for such endeavors, but
this kind of language
masked the importance of the Creator, the place of Jesus Christ, and the use of
the Bible, prayer, and healing. It is quite fair to say that the latter–the
Creator, Jesus Christ, Bible, prayer, and healing rather than
"conversion"–marked the mission and program of the missions. See the excellent
survey in: Howard Clinebell, Understanding and Counseling Persons with
Alcohol, Drug, and Behavioral Addictions. Rev. and Enl. Ed. Nashville:
Abingdon Press, 1968, pp. 167-194. The following were the three major mission
landmarks:
(1) Jerry McCauley’s
Water Street Mission was founded in October, 1872 - the outcropping of his
own deliverance from alcoholism; and it helped thousands. Meetings were simple.
There were no sermons. They opened with singing, a Bible reading, and a message
from Jerry. This was followed by testimonies where drunkards spoke of their fall
and rebirth. Often, Jerry laid hands on the penitent and encouraged him to pray
out loud for himself.
(2) Next came the
Gospel Missions - still in existence today with a new name, but better
remembered as the International Union of Gospel Missions. In April, 1882, Samuel
Hadley overcame his alcoholism with a religious experience and passed the
Gospel mission torch to his son, and these events marked the beginning of that
approach.
(3) Hadley’s son later
was in charge of Calvary Rescue Mission with Shoemaker being an
underlying recovery force when Sam became rector of Calvary Episcopal Church
in New York in 1925. It was at the Calvary Rescue Mission that Ebby Thacher,
Bill Wilson, and thousands of others overcame their alcoholism. The meetings
involved hymns, Bible reading, prayers, testimonies, and decisions for Christ.
The cry was "I’ve got religion." (William L. White. Slaying the Dragon:
The History of Addiction Treatment and Recovery in America. Bloomington,
IL: Chestnut Health Systems/Lighthouse Institute, 1998, pp. 71-74). Reverend
Shoemaker uttered a simple description of Calvary’s Mission on November 25,
1932. He said it was "where God reclaims men who choose to be reborn." See Dick
B. Turning Point: A History of Early A.A.’s Spiritual Roots and Successes.
Kihei, HI: Paradise Research Publications, Inc., 1997, p. 96.
B. The Salvation
Army: It was founded in 1865 out of the pastoral work of a Methodist
Minister William
Booth. It was first called the Christian Revival Association and rechristened
the Salvation Army in 1878. Its vision was that Christian salvation and moral
education in a wholesome environment would save the body and soul of the
alcoholic. There were so many cures that the Salvation Army served alcoholics
for more than a century and was called "the largest and most successful
rehabilitation program for transient alcoholic men in the United States." Its
most striking testimonials were those in Harold Begbie’s Twice Born Men -
about rescue in the slums of London. This was a book widely read by A.A.
pioneers and recommended by Dr. Bob’s wife Anne. Unfortunately, the Army gave
way to professionalization, but its people continued to wrangle over the disease
concept. Finally they adopted these two statements about 1940:
"The Salvation
Army believes that every individual who is addicted to alcohol may find
deliverance from its bondage through submission of the total personality to
the Lordship of Jesus Christ. The Salvation Army also recognizes the value
of medical, social and psychiatric treatment for alcoholics and makes
extensive use of these services at its centers." (White, Slaying
the Dragon, supra, p. 78).
C. The Keswick
Colony of Mercy in Whiting, New Jersey. Founded in 1897 by
William Raws who
overcame alcoholism through religious salvation. Up to 39 men at a time reside
there, undergoing Bible study, prayer, and counseling. They make a "pastoral
covenant" to continued religious education and are expected to seek continued
support through religious recovery groups such as Alcoholics Victorious. More
than 17,000 alcoholic men have sought help there since its founding in 1897.
(White, Slaying the Dragon, supra, pp. 75-76).
The Revival of
Christian Healing through the person and power of Jesus Christ
See Heal the
Sick by James Moore Hickson (London: Methuen & Co., 1924).
Hickson’s book and
extensive healing work were detailed in this as one of the many healing books
studied by Dr. Bob. It reports thousands of healings world-wide..
See Healing in
Jesus Name by Ethel R. Willitts (Crawfordsville, Indiana: Ethel R.
Willitts, Publisher,
1931). This review of Biblical healings and the personal healings by the author
was studied by Dr. Bob.
See Psychology
and Life by Leslie D. Weatherhead (New York: AbingdonPress,1935).
Also, Leslie D.
Weatherhead, Religion, Psychology and Healing, supra. Though
Weatherhead’s materials are heavy with writing on psychological, spiritualism,
and psychic methods, Dr. Weatherhead was Minister of the City Temple in London
and wrote exhaustively on the place of healing in the modern church.
Highlighting the merits of Christian Science, he nonetheless rejects it, as he
does the importance of healings at Lourdes. He then mentions the work of The
Guild of Health, started in 1905 to arouse the Church of England and others to a
fresh recognition of the place of health of mind and body in the Christian
message. Next comes his discussion of The Guild of St. Raphael, formed in 1915,
to push the Anglican Church and unite within the Catholic Church those who hold
the faith that "Our Lord wills to work in and through His Church for the health
of her members in spirit, mind, and body. Holy Unction, The Laying on of Hands,
and intercessory prayer are utilized. Next, the Emmanuel Movement in America and
the role of Worcester, Mc Comb, and Coriat. Next, Milton Abbey, opened in 1937
with Rev. John Maillard, an Anglican Clergyman as first warden–Maillard’s book,
Healing in the Name of Jesus, having just been published. Weatherhead
next discusses The Divine Healing Mission, closely linked with the work of James
Moore Hickson. He mentions The Friend’s Spiritual Healing Fellowship (Quaker),
The Methodist Society for Medical and Pastoral Practice, founded in 1946, The
Churches’ Council of Healing started in 1944 under the impetus of Archbishop
Temple. Independently of the foregoing discussion of missions and individuals,
Weatherhead analyzes the practice of intercession and The Laying on of Hands.
And see the discussion of Weatherhead’s materials in Dick B. Dr. Bob
and His Library 3rd ed. (Kihei, HI: Paradise Research
Publications, Inc., 1998), pp 78-79. There are many studies of the importance of
the charismata, liturgies, anointing, sacraments, "unction,"
"incubation," shrines, demonology, exorcism, and the laying on of hands as part
of Christian healing and Christian history. See Reverend F. W. Puller,
Anointing of the Sick: In Scripture and Tradition, With Some Considerations on
the Numbering of the Sacraments, supra; Dearmer, Body and Soul,
supra, pp. 287 et. seq.; Evelyn Frost, Christian Healing: A
Consideration of the Place of Spiritual Healing in the Church of To-day in the
Light of The Doctrine and Practice of the Ante-Nicene Church, London: A. R.
Mobray & Co. Limited, 1940; William Temple, Christus Veritas An Essay
(London: Macmillan & Co Ltd, 1954); Dawson, Healing: Pagan and Christian,
supra; Pridie, The Church’s Ministry of Healing, supra
And see the many
other titles on healing and prayer that were studied and
circulated by Dr. Bob
among A.A. Pioneers and their families. See Dick B. Dr. Bob and His
Library, supra, pp. 35-40, 83-85. In the early A.A. of Akron, there
was circulation and study of a large number of prayer and healing books
including those by Glenn Clark, Starr Daily, Lewis L. Dunnington, Mary Baker
Eddy, Charles and Cora Filmore, Harry Emerson Fosdick, Emmet Fox, Gerald Heard,
E. Stanley Jones, Frank Laubach, Charles Laymon, Rufus Mosely, William Parker,
F. L. Rawson, Samuel M. Shoemaker, B. H. Streeter, L. W. Grensted, Howard Rose,
Cecil Rose, St. Augustine, Brother Lawrence, Mary Tileston, Oswald Chambers, T.
R. Glover, E. Herman, Donald Carruthers, and Nora Smith Holm with her
Runner’s Bible. See Dick B., The Books Early AAs Read for Spiritual
Growth, 7th ed. (Kihei, HI: Paradise Research Publications, Inc.,
1998). As our bibliography at the close of this books shows, and also as the
foregoing citations as to healings make clear, the period of Dr. Bob’s study of
prayer and healing was one of widespread scholarly discourse on this very same
subject. It does not seem surprising, therefore, that Dr. Bob observed prayer
time at least three times a day; that he studied and quoted Scripture with great
frequency; and that he was asked to and did in fact pray for others. As he
himself expressed as to his beliefs: "Your Heavenly Father will never let you
down!"
Successes of
Oxford Group people in overcoming alcoholism prior to A.A.
In their zeal to
cut down the Oxford Group, many have ignored the well-documented
victories over
alcoholism through the power of God by well-known Oxford Group writers and
leaders–most contemporaries of friends of Bill Wilson’s. These include
Rowland Hazard, F. Shepard Cornell, Victor C. Kitchen, Ebby Thacher, James
Houck, Charles Clapp, Jr., William Griffith Wilson, and even Russell Firestone
for a time. Both Dr. Frank N. D. Buchman (founder of the Oxford Group) and
Rev. Samuel Shoemaker (its most prolific writer) helped sober up many drunks
through the power of God. Their classic phrase was: Sin is the problem. Jesus
Christ is the cure. The result is a miracle. See Dick B. Cured!, supra,
pp. 18, 30-31.
The Present Tendency
of Writers to Ignore our Real Spiritual Healing Roots and to Bloat up the
Supposed Importance of a Few, Unimportant, Unsuccessful, Little-known
Predecessors at the turn of the Last Century
The Washingtonians.
You can find more hoopla and writing among professionals, historians, and
even AAs about the "Washingtonians" than you can about Dr. Bob, Anne Smith,
Henrietta Seiberling, T. Henry Williams, and Rev. Sam Shoemaker–A.A.’s real
founders. You can find more hoopla and writing by these same people about
this same subject than you can about the Bible, Quiet Time, the Pioneers’
devotionals, Sam Shoemaker’s writings, other Christian literature, and Anne
Smith’s Journal–the major contributors to A.A. ideas. In a word or two, you
need to recognize that the Washingtonians are a flash in the plan when it
comes to their relevance to A.A. They were formed in 1840. They were deader
than a door nail in 1847. They did not offer the Bible, Quiet Time, the
Creator, Jesus Christ, Christian literature, salvation, or religious
principles that were the heart of A.A.’s spiritual program. So we will
ignore them in this paper!
The Emmanuel
Clinic and the Lay Therapy Movement. This was founded by two ministers
and a physician in 1906. Its greatest problem is that it was a
"psychological" approach to recovery. Worcester and Mc Comb said: "We do not
plead for a return to the mere accidents of the early Christian age. . . .
Great as is the power of the subconscious,, greater still, we believe, are
the powers of reason, emotion, and will. Hence, one of the principal
remedies for the nervous maladies of which we are speaking is psychic,
moral, and religious re-education. . . . [we] say, ‘God does it in and
through the forces of nature.’ The therapeutic procedures of the Emmanuel
Movement are those which are used among all scientific workers, such as
suggestion, psychic analysis, re-education, work, and rest" See Worcester
and Mc Comb, The Christian Religion as a Healing Power, supra,
pp. 96, 103, 118. Such talk probably burdened today’s recovery community
with many godless ideas about group therapy, individual counseling,
self-help support, spirituality, hypnosis, relaxation, and "inspirational"
reading. Its popular later book was The Common Sense of Drinking by
Richard R. Peabody. And Peabody himself reportedly died intoxicated. It may
well have fostered the "no cure" doctrine - once an alcoholic, always an
alcoholic. And it can hardly said to be based on the power of God. So we
will ignore this too.
What Dr. Carl Jung
seems to have introduced into Bill Wilson’s recovery thinking
Rowland Hazard’s
spiritual experience, better known as a religious conversion: According
to Bill Wilson’s early writings I found in Stepping Stones, at Bedford
Hills, New York, A.A. really began when Rowland Hazard, once again drunk and
despairing, returned to Dr. Carl Jung in Switzerland asking what he could do
to whip his alcoholism. Jung replied: "Occasionally, Rowland, alcoholics
have recovered through spiritual experiences, better known as religious
conversions. . . . I’m talking about the kind of religious experience that
reaches into the depths of a man, that changes his whole motivation and
outlook and so transforms his life that the impossible becomes possible" (W.
G. Wilson, Reflections, p. 111). Jung told Wilson many years later: "His
[Rowland’s] craving for alcohol was the equivalent on a low level of the
spiritual thirst of our being for wholeness, expressed in medieval language:
the union with God. . . . The only right and legitimate way to such an
experience is, that it happens to you in reality and it can only happen when
you walk on a path which leads to higher understanding" (Dick B., Turning
Point, supra, p. 84).
The unconvincing
and unsupported claim that Rowland Hazard never visited with, or was told by
Dr. Carl Jung that such a conversion was required for cure. Two writers
have recently implied that the whole Rowland Hazard story and solution is a
hoax (See White, Slaying the Dragon, supra, p. 128). Their
so-called "investigations" were scanty and lacking in comprehension and
depth as they supposedly looked through Rowland’s papers at the Rhode Island
Historical Society and Jung’s records and found no account of the
doctor-patient event. To make this allegation stick, however, they would
further have to prove that Rowland Hazard, Ebby Thacher, Bill Wilson, Rev.
Sam Shoemaker, and Dr. Carl Jung were each and all outspoken liars. And,
having "investigated" many of Rowland’s records myself, and having been a
trial attorney for many years with lots of experience in digging up
evidence, and finding no reason to impeach the testimony of the foregoing
accounts by Hazard, Thacher, Wilson, Shoemaker, and Jung, I believe the
assertions of White and Wally P., the writers, who appear responsible for
them, are totally wrong.
The peculiar and
unique meaning of Jung’s "conversion," "religious," and "spiritual"
experience language. I have personally have little doubt that Dr. Jung
told Rowland Hazard that he (Jung) had been unsuccessful in treating, and
could not cure Rowland. But what the Bible, theologians, and Christian
evangelists mean by the prescribed "religious conversion" is probably not at
all a conversion of the type to which Jung referred. First of all, Jung was
a physician, not a cleric or theologian. Second, the Bible idea of
conversion has to do with rebirth, of being born again of the spirit with
the incorruptible seed of Christ, of confessing Jesus as Lord and believing
that God raised Jesus from the dead (See John 3:1-17, 14:6; Acts 2:32-40,
4:10-12; Romans 10:9-10; Ephesians 1:12-14; Colossians 1:27; 1 Peter
1:18-23). Third, Dr. Leslie Weatherhead analyzed Jung’s ideas as follows:
"Jung seeks to lift the patient to a higher plane of living. What he calls
"individualization" is an experience close to spiritual conversion. A true
conception of both cannot regard either as final. Spiritual conversion is an
experience which marks the end of man’s search for the right road, but not
the end of his spiritual journey. Individuation, in Jung’s sense, is the
wise setting of the house of one’s personality in order, but it is a task at
which one is wise to work for the rest of one’s life" (Weatherhead,
Psychology, Religion and Healing, supra, p. 287). Jung himself
said: "Religious experience is absolute. It is indisputable. You can only
say that you never had such an experience, and your opponent will say :
"Sorry, I have." And there your discussion will come to an end. No matter
what the world thinks about religious experience, the one who has it
possesses the great treasure of a thing that has provided him with a source
of life, meaning and beauty and that has given a new splendor to the world
and to mankind. He has pistis [believing or faith] and peace. Where is the
criterium by which you could say that such a life is not legitimate, that
such experience is not valid and that such pistis is a mere illusion? . . .
But what is the difference between a real illusion and a healing religious
experience? It is merely a difference in words (Jung, Psychology and
Religion, pp. 113-114).
Jung’s
prescription for, and definition of "religious" or "conversion" experience
did not square with the Good Book. In three sentences, we can say:
Jung’s definitions may be accurate from a psychologist’s view point. In
fact, they represent the often quoted definitions of Professor William
James. But they are not speaking of being born from above with the
incorruptible seed of Christ. At Calvary Rescue Mission where Bill Wilson
said he had been born again; and in Akron, where the A.A. pioneers accepted
Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour, the folks were not quoting either
Carl Jung or William James. They were quoting the Good Book. So was Rev. Sam
Shoemaker. And so was Dr. Frank Buchman. Hence, by turning back to William
James and Carl Jung, Bill Wilson was led down the merry by-way to
"spiritual" experience and "spiritual awakening"–both terms of Oxford Group
manufacture–and later to just "personality change" sufficient to overcome
alcoholism. None of these has anything to do with what Jesus said was
necessary in John 3:1-8 or with the conversation the Apostle Paul had with
Jesus Christ on the Road to Damascus.
The Cures AA Pioneers
Received Were Not Psychotherapeutic"Personality Changes." They Were Miracles.
They were miracles produced by reliance on Yahweh, the Creator. And Both Bill
Wilson and Dr. Bob Smith Were Very Clear in Attributing the Early A.A. Miracles
to Their Heavenly Father, the Creator
Again, for the
documentation, see Dick B. Cured! Proven Help for Alcoholics and Addicts
(Kihei, HI: Paradise Research Publications, Inc., 2003).
Now to the job of
putting together the actual historical pieces of our pioneer A.A. program which
relied for deliverance on the power of the Yahweh, the Creator–their God and
mine.
END |