|
New Email From AA Historey
Dick B of Hawaii
What “Conference Approved” Literature Means
Please
post this much needed article from Pete's Stuff. It incorporates the
long-ignored Box 459 article that GSO said it couldn't find. If you want to
see an excellent and much longer discussion of this, go to the Hindsfoot
Foundation site where Professor Glenn Chesnut lays it all out in terms of its
importance. I receive questions about this all the time; and people at
conferences, Central Offices, and meetings are confronted with the conference
approved nonsense with great frequency. Any AA can read anything any time
anywhere for any purpose. There is no Tradition that says otherwise. There is
no Tradition that can or should or will censor or censure what is presented
at a meeting. And if someone thinks they've found the mythical tradition, tell
them the Traditions are not laws, are not binding on anyone, and were never
intended to prohibit free speech or freedom of religion by AAs or others.
Those who suggest otherwise just don't know A.A. Nor do they know that early
Alcoholics Anonymous was a Christian Fellowship, studied the King James
Version of the Bible, read all kinds of literature--Protestant, Roman
Catholic, New Thought, medical, and otherwise, and put out reams and reams of
pamphlets and guides as the years went by. Included were pamphlets from many
Central Offices and Intergroups--including the long-running Cleveland Central
Bulletin, the four Akron AA pamphlets, The Four Absolutes, Then there were
other writers mentioned below and not mentioned below--Clarence Snyder, Sister
Ignatia, Marty Mann, Father Pfau, Richmond Walker, Ed Webster, and
on-and-on.Not to forget over 500 Oxford Group and Sam Shoemaker books and
pamphlets that were read and circulated byDr. Bob himself. And let's not
forget that the most ignored and suppressed writing of all - Anne Smith's
Journal - contained the heart of early A.A. and was discussed almost every
morning at the Smith home Quiet Times.
Take
off the shackles, and use your mind! Better still, see what someone else has
had to say. Particularly, the Creator in what He revealed in His Word. Our
basic ideas came from there.
My
recent title Making Known the Biblical History and Roots of Alcoholics
Anonymous specifically identifies hundreds and hundreds of writings that
have contributed to the origins, history, founding, principles, and practices
of A.A. in just the few years it has been in existence:
http://www.dickb.com/makingknown.shtml
|
What “Conference
Approved” Literature Means
|
|
GSO
Box
4-5-9 1978
(Volume 23, No 4)
|
Any literature
that pertains to the principles of AA or is approved by a Group Conscience
- is perfectly acceptable to be read by any AA member or in an AA meeting. |
|
|
You hear it in meetings, “…we have AA Approved Literature available for
sale at cost…”
You hear it in group
conscience meetings “…we should only allow readings from AA Approved
Literature…”
You hear non-group members crosstalking in a meeting when someone reads
from Richmond Walkers’ 24 Hours a Day, Emmet Fox’s Sermon On The Mount, or
one of Ralph Pfau’s Golden Books –“You can’t read that in an AA meeting –
it’s NOT AA Approved Literature…”
Factually, unlike Alanon,
there is no such thing as AA Approved Literature. The early AA’s read from
the Bible, the Upper Room, Oswald Chambers, Cecil Rose, Leslie Weatherhead,
Sam Shoemaker, Emmet Fox, Richmond Walker, Ralph Pfau and many others – a
simple visit to
Dickb.com will bear this out. As Dick B. aptly points out “Whatever
some may think, A.A. has no index of forbidden books.”
In the 1950’s AA World Services took
over WORKS publishing’s rights to publish the Big Book and began
publishing other books as well. In the course of the next 40 years AAWS
began to publish more books but eventually lost the copyright on the first
two editions of the Big Book. Until 1993 books which were owned and
printed by AAWS were identified by the use of a Circle/Triangle Symbol
bearing the three legacies.
On
May 21, 1993 , an AA
World Service Ad Hoc committee released an unsigned document titled:
Follow-up Statement Regarding Use of the Circle/ Triangle Symbol. In it,
AAWS stated that Alcoholics Anonymous will phase out the 'official' use
of the circle and triangle symbol in and on its literature, letterheads
and other material. That document was issued without a conference action
or a group conscience.
The term “Conference Approved”
literature now replaces the Circle/Triangle Logo to merely “identify”
(AAGV Vol. 50-7 1993) the books solely owned and published by AAWS and not
as a predetermined list. The most definitive illustration of this is that
the public domain first edition of the Big Book is NOT “Conference
Approved”. “Conference Approved” in no way constitutes a list of any
written documents of which an AA body approves or disapproves. (Please see
the ad hoc committee
Final Report of the 1993 General Service Conference)
A formal statement
concerning the Conference, the G.S.O, and what AA members read was issued
by the General Services Office of AA in 1978.
|
|
“WHAT CONFERENCED-APPROVED MEANS”
GSO
Box
4-5-9
1978
(Volume 23, No 4)
AA’s General
Service Office said:
“It does
not mean the Conference disapproves of any other publications.
Many local A.A. central offices publish their own meeting lists. A.A.
as a whole does not oppose these, any more than A.A.
disapproves of the Bible or any other publications from any source
that A.A.’s find useful.
What any A.A.
member reads is no business of G.S.O., or of the Conference,
naturally.” |
|
|